2 Comments

Hello Aymenn thank you for this work. I am very interested in the first 2 statements explicitly mentioning ‘security sources’ told Amaq that this attack was perpetrated by IS fighter.

It suggests that this attack wasn’t centrally coordinated and known by leadership at Amaq at the time it happened.

And it opens the opportunity for ‘outside interference’. Meaning that the attack could’ve been coordinated by actors other than IS, and only executed by these low-level Tajiks.

I’m also interested in the attack not being claimed by an actual province, instead just mentioning ‘Russia’.

In your experience - how rare are both occurrences(mentioning sources, and excluding province), and do you consider them as indications that this attack might’ve been coordinator together with other actors?

Expand full comment

They are religious nutcases. There is no God, it's a load of nonsense. Grow up yuo idiots.

Expand full comment